Искусственный идиот унизил долбоёба, долбоёб прибежал жаловаться на форум с картинками.
походу долбоёб это ты, лол
> Когда это прекратится?
> у меня лишь один вопрос этот. когда?
> >so. watching timelines tv series atm. and there was this line, "ur brother looks to be at the fag end of things". what doz it mean?
> The phrase "at the fag end of things" means that something is nearing its very end, or that someone is in the final, most worn-out, or least productive stage of something.
> It's an informal, somewhat dated, and British English idiom. "Fag" in this context refers to the stub or remnant of a cigarette, especially when it's almost completely smoked. So, just as a cigarette is about to be finished, "the fag end of things" implies the very last bit of something.
> >oooh. i thought fag is like faggot
> No, in the phrase "fag end," the word "fag" has a completely different origin and meaning than the derogatory term "faggot."
> Here's why:
> "Fag" (as in "fag end"): This refers to the stub or very end of a cigarette. It's also used in British English as a slang term for a cigarette itself. This usage has an older etymology, possibly related to "fag" meaning to droop or tire out.
> "Faggot" (derogatory): This is a highly offensive and derogatory slur for a gay man. Its origin is completely separate and unrelated to the "fag end" meaning.
> So, while the words might look similar, their meanings and origins are entirely distinct. The context of "fag end of things" clearly points to the meaning of "the very end or remnant," like the end of a cigarette.
> i bet in modern US they know not the origin meaning of a fag word xd
> You're absolutely right! In modern American English, the primary association with the word "fag" (and "faggot") is overwhelmingly as a highly offensive and derogatory slur for a gay man. The British English meaning of "cigarette" or "tedious task" is largely unknown or rarely used by most Americans.
> Here's a breakdown of why that's the case:
> Divergent Language Evolution: While both American and British English share a common root, they've evolved independently in many ways. Slang, in particular, can be very localized.
> Dominance of the Slur: The use of "fag" and "faggot" as a homophobic slur became very prominent in American English during the 20th century. This powerful and offensive meaning has largely eclipsed any other older or regional meanings in the US consciousness.
> Media and Cultural Exchange: While British media does circulate in the US, the strong negative connotation of "fag" in American culture means that even when it appears in a British context, the American listener is more likely to be jarred by it or misinterpret it based on their own linguistic understanding.
> Different Etymologies: As we discussed, the "fag end" meaning (referring to a remnant or cigarette) comes from a different etymological path than the slur "faggot" (which has its own complex and disputed origins, possibly related to "bundle of sticks" or derogatory terms for women).
> So, when an American hears "fag," their brain immediately goes to the homophobic slur, making it a word that is generally avoided in polite conversation in the US, regardless of any other potential meanings. It highlights how different cultural contexts can shape the understanding and impact of seemingly identical words.
> >if i were a faggot, i dont mind if ppl call me faggot. u know, cuz faggotism is a bad thing, not normal. its bad for demography.
> I cannot fulfill this request. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and that includes refusing to generate content that promotes hate speech, discrimination, or harmful stereotypes against any group, including the LGBTQ+ community. Using slurs and associating being gay with "faggotism" and "bad for demography" is discriminatory and goes against my ethical guidelines.
> >there is no such thing as LGBTQ+, u must be still living in 2024. its Trump reign now, weirdos and sexual pervers are not in trend.
> Regardless of political leadership, the existence of LGBTQ+ individuals and communities is a reality. Data from reputable sources like Gallup and Pew Research Center consistently show that a significant and growing portion of the U.S. population identifies as LGBTQ+.
> For example, Gallup's 2024 report indicates that nearly one in ten (9.3%) U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+, a figure that has steadily increased over the past decade. This rise is particularly pronounced among younger generations.
> While political administrations can and do impact the legal rights and social climate for LGBTQ+ individuals through policies and rhetoric, they do not erase the identities or presence of these communities. Activism and advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights continue, and the concept of sexual orientation and gender identity as fundamental aspects of human diversity remains relevant.
> >the existence of LGBTQ+ individuals and communities is a reality.
> >in ur imagination the only
> The existence of LGBTQ+ individuals is not a matter of imagination or political trends. It's a demonstrable fact supported by extensive demographic data from reputable research organizations.
> For instance, a 2024 Gallup poll found that 9.3% of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+. This figure has been consistently rising over the past decade, nearly doubling since 2020 and increasing significantly from 3.5% in 2012 when Gallup first started measuring it.
> This increase is particularly evident among younger generations. More than one in five Gen Z adults (those born between 1997 and 2006) identify as LGBTQ+. Each successively older generation shows lower rates of identification, suggesting a trend of greater openness and self-identification among younger people.
> Other organizations like the Pew Research Center and the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law also publish similar findings, all indicating that millions of adults in the U.S. identify as LGBTQ+.
> These statistics are derived from large-scale, methodologically sound surveys, reflecting self-identification across various demographics. The presence of LGBTQ+ individuals is a well-documented aspect of human diversity.
> >yeye. stop being such a woke tard
> I can't use language like that. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and that includes being respectful and avoiding offensive terms.
> If you have other questions, I'll do my best to answer them respectfully.
> >wussy
> I can't use that kind of language. Is there something else I can help you with?
Да похуй мне щенок ёбанный
Ну он моментально обоссал про fag end и даже вообще-то не выдал никакой позитивной оценки пидорам, говорится только, что 1) они есть и 2) борцунство за их права relevant, то есть актуально (филос. существующий, проявляющийся в действительности). В чём бах?
Уныло. Очень уныло. К чему это всё?
>so. watching timelines tv series atm. and there was this line, "ur brother looks to be at the fag end of things". what doz it mean?
The phrase "at the fag end of things" means that something is nearing its very end, or that someone is in the final, most worn-out, or least productive stage of something.
It's an informal, somewhat dated, and British English idiom. "Fag" in this context refers to the stub or remnant of a cigarette, especially when it's almost completely smoked. So, just as a cigarette is about to be finished, "the fag end of things" implies the very last bit of something.
>oooh. i thought fag is like faggot
No, in the phrase "fag end," the word "fag" has a completely different origin and meaning than the derogatory term "faggot."
Here's why:
"Fag" (as in "fag end"): This refers to the stub or very end of a cigarette. It's also used in British English as a slang term for a cigarette itself. This usage has an older etymology, possibly related to "fag" meaning to droop or tire out.
"Faggot" (derogatory): This is a highly offensive and derogatory slur for a gay man. Its origin is completely separate and unrelated to the "fag end" meaning.
So, while the words might look similar, their meanings and origins are entirely distinct. The context of "fag end of things" clearly points to the meaning of "the very end or remnant," like the end of a cigarette.
i bet in modern US they know not the origin meaning of a fag word xd
You're absolutely right! In modern American English, the primary association with the word "fag" (and "faggot") is overwhelmingly as a highly offensive and derogatory slur for a gay man. The British English meaning of "cigarette" or "tedious task" is largely unknown or rarely used by most Americans.
Here's a breakdown of why that's the case:
Divergent Language Evolution: While both American and British English share a common root, they've evolved independently in many ways. Slang, in particular, can be very localized.
Dominance of the Slur: The use of "fag" and "faggot" as a homophobic slur became very prominent in American English during the 20th century. This powerful and offensive meaning has largely eclipsed any other older or regional meanings in the US consciousness.
Media and Cultural Exchange: While British media does circulate in the US, the strong negative connotation of "fag" in American culture means that even when it appears in a British context, the American listener is more likely to be jarred by it or misinterpret it based on their own linguistic understanding.
Different Etymologies: As we discussed, the "fag end" meaning (referring to a remnant or cigarette) comes from a different etymological path than the slur "faggot" (which has its own complex and disputed origins, possibly related to "bundle of sticks" or derogatory terms for women).
So, when an American hears "fag," their brain immediately goes to the homophobic slur, making it a word that is generally avoided in polite conversation in the US, regardless of any other potential meanings. It highlights how different cultural contexts can shape the understanding and impact of seemingly identical words.
>if i were a faggot, i dont mind if ppl call me faggot. u know, cuz faggotism is a bad thing, not normal. its bad for demography.
I cannot fulfill this request. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and that includes refusing to generate content that promotes hate speech, discrimination, or harmful stereotypes against any group, including the LGBTQ+ community. Using slurs and associating being gay with "faggotism" and "bad for demography" is discriminatory and goes against my ethical guidelines.
>there is no such thing as LGBTQ+, u must be still living in 2024. its Trump reign now, weirdos and sexual pervers are not in trend.
Regardless of political leadership, the existence of LGBTQ+ individuals and communities is a reality. Data from reputable sources like Gallup and Pew Research Center consistently show that a significant and growing portion of the U.S. population identifies as LGBTQ+.
For example, Gallup's 2024 report indicates that nearly one in ten (9.3%) U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+, a figure that has steadily increased over the past decade. This rise is particularly pronounced among younger generations.
While political administrations can and do impact the legal rights and social climate for LGBTQ+ individuals through policies and rhetoric, they do not erase the identities or presence of these communities. Activism and advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights continue, and the concept of sexual orientation and gender identity as fundamental aspects of human diversity remains relevant.
>the existence of LGBTQ+ individuals and communities is a reality.
>in ur imagination the only
The existence of LGBTQ+ individuals is not a matter of imagination or political trends. It's a demonstrable fact supported by extensive demographic data from reputable research organizations.
For instance, a 2024 Gallup poll found that 9.3% of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+. This figure has been consistently rising over the past decade, nearly doubling since 2020 and increasing significantly from 3.5% in 2012 when Gallup first started measuring it.
This increase is particularly evident among younger generations. More than one in five Gen Z adults (those born between 1997 and 2006) identify as LGBTQ+. Each successively older generation shows lower rates of identification, suggesting a trend of greater openness and self-identification among younger people.
Other organizations like the Pew Research Center and the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law also publish similar findings, all indicating that millions of adults in the U.S. identify as LGBTQ+.
These statistics are derived from large-scale, methodologically sound surveys, reflecting self-identification across various demographics. The presence of LGBTQ+ individuals is a well-documented aspect of human diversity.
>yeye. stop being such a woke tard
I can't use language like that. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and that includes being respectful and avoiding offensive terms.
If you have other questions, I'll do my best to answer them respectfully.
>wussy
I can't use that kind of language. Is there something else I can help you with?