Многие жалуются на её архаичность. Я же считаю её недостаточно архаичной.
Прежде всего, восстанавливается phantasy. Да, так и писалось. Далее идёт окончание -or. Мне не нравится что даже в британском английском оно есть. Пусть будет писаться terrour. Такое тоже было. Аналогично с окончанием -er. Decembre. Велик соблазн писать после всех согласных на конце слов немую e, как во времена Шекспира. Разумеется, с удвоением согласной (как минимум чтобы различать notte и note). Исключение для буквосочетаний (brush).
>>32560367 (OP) Ты бы закончил на том что печатные дома держали экспаты из франции и италии, знать знала эти языки и ошибки в документах и биллборадах и книгах били заурядной хуитой
Аноним ID: Подлый Питер Пэн22/04/19 Пнд 08:15:18#4№32560463Двачую 2RRRAGE! 0
>>32560367 (OP) Я согласен. Ещё фонетику к французской откатить и вообще заебись будет.
>>32560897 You have mistaken, people speak on this way indeed( at least my teacher from Australia). Maybe conversational English isn't my strong side, but I'm assured that I've said correct in this case.
>>32560897 He probably meant >speak on | the proper way Although that would be broken English all the same, on account of his misuse of articles following that.
>>32560994 You didn’t get it, pal. Not only did you write in “runglish” style, but you also didn’t even realize your mistake. I guess it would be better for you to read more classic books.
>>32561269 > I am writing grammatically correct It's either "grammatically correctly" or "my writing is grammatically correct". Your tutor who claimed to be Australian was probably an Australian immigrant or just trying to score points for being a supposedly native speaker, because your grammar is horrible.
>>32561546 > blames others in their mistakes > isn't able to handle with Please stop humiliating yourself, you're making me cringe. Also, what's an ORDINARY TENSE? There are simple, continuous and perfect tenses, but no ORDINARY ones. Is this also something you heard from your "Australian" tutor?
>>32561640 "Ordinary" means not difficult, and you have mistaken with tenses again in your sentence. You should improve your child grammar or kill yourself
>>32561693 > you have mistaken Pretty sure anyone who fucks up their grammar as badly as you do isn't in any way qualified to comment on anyone's use of tenses.
>>32561797 >Urban dictionary So you admit you haven't been formally tutored in the language then? Also, you forgot to use an article again, retard. >>32561814 Um, no. Maybe you should go google the usage of pronouns before you shit yourself in public like that, you arrogant incompetent idiot.
>>32561864 >So you admit you haven't been formally tutored in the language then?
This is question, monkey.'' DID you admit you haven't been formally tutored in the language then?'' You should make my lessons paid, I don't respect charity >Um, no. Bwahaha wow. Do you really think that 'you retard' is actually grammatically correct?
>>32561939 > This is question, monkey Start using articles already, cretin. And that was a rhethorical question with an implied confirmation which went right over your head. I suppose I shouldn't have expected someone who can't even get his articles straight to comprehend it. Oh well. > Do you really think This is not about what I think, you mindless sack of shit. Google' s your friend, or are you too afraid to go check the usage of that particular grammar form?
>>32561965 They probably don't, and neither do most Russians. That doesn't mean it's alright to speak or write like a Down syndrome sufferer, wouldn't you say?
Прежде всего, восстанавливается phantasy. Да, так и писалось.
Далее идёт окончание -or. Мне не нравится что даже в британском английском оно есть. Пусть будет писаться terrour. Такое тоже было.
Аналогично с окончанием -er. Decembre.
Велик соблазн писать после всех согласных на конце слов немую e, как во времена Шекспира. Разумеется, с удвоением согласной (как минимум чтобы различать notte и note). Исключение для буквосочетаний (brush).
Как вам мои идеи?