Всё идёт по плану, чтобы вы бугуртили и создавали срач между странами и народами, для возникновения войны. Идте нахуй со своей войной, мрази.
-->
Смеюсь с манямирка опа. Олланд не предлагал снять санкции с парашки, не выдумывай.
Журнальчик просто любил высмеять исламообезьян, и логично довыебывался.
Журнальчик просто любил высмеять исламообезьян, и логично довыебывался.
>парашки
А что, порашники со своей порашей уже на французские борды полезли?
Ох лол, представляю картину.
>+15 santimov nakati
>merde!
Последнюю шутку они выкинули за час до терракта. Это совпадение. Реальный мотив в ОП посте
Пытаются разжечь ненависть в обществе, хули думать.
Даже всякая либертота, которая топит за "европейские ценности", истерит по полной.
Мусульмане же охуевают от всех сопутствующих антиисламских визгов.
Плюс вот лента, знакомая по России, Гонконгу, Украине и так далее.
Даже всякая либертота, которая топит за "европейские ценности", истерит по полной.
Мусульмане же охуевают от всех сопутствующих антиисламских визгов.
Плюс вот лента, знакомая по России, Гонконгу, Украине и так далее.
А что лента?
Кстати, что там с гонконгом? Заглохло же все.
Нужно что бы Абу скрыл /zog/ так же как скрыт /dev/.
В поддержку твоей версии
Кому было выгодно совершить кровавое убийство в Париже?
Слушал французов в течение часа. Если отбросить слащавую рекламу, то говорили только и исключительно о теракте в парижской редакции „Charlie Hebdo”.
Как минимум два террориста, одетые в форму, очень похожую на обмундирование полицейских из антитеррористической бригады, прошли охрану здания, застрелив одного из них. Затем спокойно поднялись на второй этаж, прошли несколько корридоров, открыли бронированную дверь (видимо незапертую) и, уверенно подойдя к нужному кабинету, вошли в редакционную комнату и расстреляли из Калашниковых проводивших совещание сотрудников.
К слову, совещания проводились раз в неделю, всегда с 10 утра до 12-30 и лишь по средам.
Уборщица из соседнего дома видела, как бандиты вышли из здания и сели в Ситроен, застрелив по дороге одного из полицейских. Которые, по её словам, были сильно напуганы. А террористы, садясь в машину, прокричали „Аллах акбар, Мохамед теперь отомщён”.
Очень эмоциональную речь произнёс бывший директор издания Филип Валь, 20 лет руководивший им. Помимо прочего он высказался в том духе, что пора признать наличие проблемы. Заключающейся, по его словам, в существовании экстремистского мусульманского движения. Судя по многочисленным оправданиям перед этим заявлением, такие высказывания ранее во Франции не поощрялись.
Французы также весьма необычно отреагировали на событие. Во многих городах страны люди собирались спонтанно на главных площадях и... аплодировали. Предварительно нацепив на себя плакатики со словами „Я - Charlie Hebdo”. Очень много слов о демократии и свободе слова. А также о преступлениях исламистов.
В начале прослушивания этого радио, когда сообщали о посланиях зарубежных глав государств, фамилия Путина шла сразу после Меркель. После Путина упоминали Обаму. В конце прослушивания порядок поменяли. Британских премьера и королеву упоминали первыми, Путина последним.
Это - добросовестный пересказ услышанного.
Теперь - что показалось необычным. Во-первых, фразы террористов. Карикатуры были напечатаны
в Charlie Hebdo несколько лет назад. И ничего, жили люди и продолжали работать. Как и небезызвестный Салман Рушди, которого четверть века назад исламисты также якобы приговорили к смерти.
Популярность нынешнего французского президента находится на самом низком в истории страны уровне. И вдруг - о удача! - такой повод выступить утешителем нации, показать себя во всей организаторской красе, давая отпор террористам...
Не буду утверждать, что именно Олланд способствовал организации преступления. Вряд ли его умственный уровень позволил бы чётко спланировать подобное. Хотя в безнравственности президенту не откажешь. Скорее всего это затеяли те, кому выгодно отвлечь внимание „международной общественности” от других, более важных и кровавых дел, творящихся в Северном полушарии.
Тут же на ум приходит, кроме, естественно, Украины - начавшееся признание Палестины. Кто создал и поддерживает эту кровавую напряжённость в данных регионах? Ответ очевиден. Кто натравливает христиан на мусульман в Европе и России? Те, кто проводят политику „разделяй и властвуй” методами навязывания мультикультурализма, сталкивания лбами религиозные сообщества, натравливания атеистов на мусульман и христиан. Вот только случаев натравливания той же публики на иудаизм что-то не припоминается! А издание „Charlie Hebdo” атаковывало не одних лишь мусульман. Христианам также постоянно доставалось, причём больше и чаще, нежели первым.
А ведь мы все знаем, в чьих руках находится мировая значимая пресса? Вот там и следует искать заказчиков сегодняшнего кровавого преступления.
И второй момент. Это - отмеченная выше неестественная реакция французов. Прямо в репортажах говорилось, что публика была „радостно возбуждена”, постоянно аплодировала. Якобы в знак солидарности с просветительской деятельностью убитых.
Также вызывает некое удивление „спонтанность” сбора людей на площадях. После 1967 года за французами подобного не наблюдалось. Организованные заранее митинги - да, были, но не спонтанные. Правда, в то время не было твиттеров и фейсбуков. Т.е. сегодня кто-то заранее организовал соответствующие твиты, чтобы привлечь народ на улицу.
Вот эти два момента, мгновенная идентификация преступников как исламистов, а также подозрительная спонтанность мобилизации людей вкупе с совершенно неуместными даже для французов аплодисментами - всё это, учитывая принцип „кому это выгодно” даёт основание предполагать, что мы снова стали свидетелями очередного кровавого преступления, совершённого...
И ни за что не поверю, что его сегодня совершили исламисты. Они бы это сделали в то время, по горячим следам, когда возбуждение мусульман достигло максимума, т.е. более 2-х лет назад.
Вот поэтому голосовая подпись террористов представляется совершенно наигранной. И предназначенной служить дымовой завесой, скрывающей истинных виновников.
Горожанин, иди нахуй
>И ни за что не поверю, что его сегодня совершили исламисты.
Радикальные исламисты - лучшие друзья пиндосов. Пиндосы против признания Палестины. Ну а работа с электоратом в таком стиле - это их любимое дело.
Ну а цель, видимо, в том, чтобы создать ЕС проблемы в отстаивании своих интересов на Ближнем Востоке. Хотя целей всегда несколько.
>не поверю, что его сегодня совершили исламисты
Эта манька еще пару лет назад не поверила бы и в ИГИЛ, который сегодня вон как бесчинствует
Снова кебабы расстреляли французов.
В южном пригороде Парижа, в районе города Монруж произошла стрельба. Об этом сообщает радиостанция RTL.
По имеющимся данным, вооруженный мужчина открыл огонь по полицейским. Ранение получил сотрудник правоохранительных органов. RTL отмечает, что стрелявший был задержан. Им оказался чернокожий мужчина, его имя не называется.
Позднее агентство France-Presse уточнило, что в результате перестрелки ранен был еще один человек — сотрудник дорожной службы. Оба пострадавших находятся в критическом состоянии.
http://lenta.ru/news/2015/01/08/paris/
В южном пригороде Парижа, в районе города Монруж произошла стрельба. Об этом сообщает радиостанция RTL.
По имеющимся данным, вооруженный мужчина открыл огонь по полицейским. Ранение получил сотрудник правоохранительных органов. RTL отмечает, что стрелявший был задержан. Им оказался чернокожий мужчина, его имя не называется.
Позднее агентство France-Presse уточнило, что в результате перестрелки ранен был еще один человек — сотрудник дорожной службы. Оба пострадавших находятся в критическом состоянии.
http://lenta.ru/news/2015/01/08/paris/
ну это очевидно, что терракт связан с заявлением оланда по поводу России, мне одно не понятно, если оланд действительно послал своих хозяев из сша - то назад пути у него нет. ФРАНЦИЯ ЦЕ УКРАИНА, ждите майдан во франции
ФРАНЦИЯ ЦЕ УКРАИНА, ждите майдан во франции
Страны Европы похожи на трахнутых в жопу пидарасов, постоянно строят из себя целок - что у них все как у людей, но как доходит до дела оказывается что очко у них уже давно пробито банкирами, которым достаточно нажать на нужную кнопку и в подконтрольной им стране уже ебут тех кто был не угоден
Меня крайне смутил выстрел из 74, с расстояния в 1 метр, от чего господин жандарм просто уснул, но мы с вами, взращенные на нашидах с отрубанием, отстреливанием, отрезанием бабахами бошек, знаем, что когда бабахи стреляют в голову, голову распидорашивает и ЛИТРЫ крови выливаются на землю, здесь же все очень чисто. СОВПАДЕНИЕ?
Фото хуевое, ему могли в грудь попасть, а пуля застряла. Кровь против силы тяжести не льется. Нужен осмотр трупа.
посмотри видео внимательно, если присмотреться видно как у него глаз вытекает.
Пока даже с жалкой Венгрией разобраться не могут.
двачую, иначе балаган не прекратится. Вообще надо весь двач скрыть.
>Автор ограничил доступ к видео.
Как хоть ролик назывался?
FAKE PARIS SHOOTING MISS SLOW MOTION
Если я думаю про это видео то его перезалили на ютюб.
Лайвлик блин
Опа
"Amchai Stein, the deputy editor of Israeli IBA Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting photos of the shooting."
"Amchai Stein, the deputy editor of Israeli IBA Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting photos of the shooting."
>just happened
http://lifenews.ru/news/148128
Ветеран «Альфы»: Теракт в Париже похож на плохой сценарий к фильму Ветеран антитеррористического подразделения усомнился, что убийство журналистов и полицейских во Франции совершили радикальные исламисты.
— Нестыковок действительно много. Есть кадры, где человек в маске стреляет в голову лежащему на земле полицейскому. Если судить по пороховым газам, террорист не попал, — заявил ветеран «Альфы».
Удивление бывшего бойца спецподразделения вызвал и тот факт, что президент Франции Франсуа Олланд прибыл на место бойни спустя очень короткий промежуток времени. По мнению Шевчука, служба безопасности президента допустить подобное не имела права, поскольку жизнь главы государства находилась бы в опасности.
> После влажного теракта в Минском метро, Батька тоже приехал очень быстро. товарищ майор привет.
— Кроме того, практически сразу прозвучали обвинения, что в проведении теракта виноваты мусульмане. И это при том, что люди были в масках, их лиц никто не видел. Однако полиция всем объявила, кто именно виноват в случившемся, — подытожил Игорь Шевчук.
Эксперт уверен, что подобные резонансные преступления совершаются не спонтанно и не случайными людьми.
— Я вас уверяю, весь этот процесс управляемый, и не исключено, что в связке может оказаться и Украина. Возможно, в скором времени мы увидим террористические акты на Украине, а Запад объявит, что Украина является рассадником терроризма и для усиления борьбы понадобятся некоторые действия, которые уже можно прогнозировать, — сказал Шевчук.
По словам эксперта, реакция на произошедшую трагедию лишний раз подчеркнула политику двойных стандартов, которой придерживается Запад. Политики и общественность на смерть французских карикатуристов отреагировали куда более эмоционально, чем на гибель российских журналистов на Украине, а теракт в Париже вызвал куда больший резонанс, чем нападение боевиков на Дом печати в Грозном 4 декабря, когда в противостоянии с бандитами погибли 15 чеченских силовиков.
Отметим, что Шевчук не единственный российский эксперт, кто обратил внимание на нестыковки в обстоятельствах парижского теракта. Политолог Алексей Мартынов уверен, что террористы не стали бы несколько лет вынашивать план мести за карикатуры, опубликованные в журнале Charlie Hebdo, а действовали бы импульсивно. По словам политолога, террористический акт в Париже удовлетворяет интересам США и велика вероятность, что он был спланирован американскими спецслужбами.
Напомним, 7 января двое преступников в масках ворвались в редакцию французского сатирического журнала Charlie Hebdo, где в тот момент проводилась редакционная планерка. Из автоматов они застрелили 11 человек, среди которых были сотрудники и посетители редакции, а также двое полицейских. Позднее от ран скончалась еще одна жертва кровавой бойни. После этого террористы беспрепятственно покинули место преступления на черном «ситроене».
Ветеран «Альфы»: Теракт в Париже похож на плохой сценарий к фильму Ветеран антитеррористического подразделения усомнился, что убийство журналистов и полицейских во Франции совершили радикальные исламисты.
— Нестыковок действительно много. Есть кадры, где человек в маске стреляет в голову лежащему на земле полицейскому. Если судить по пороховым газам, террорист не попал, — заявил ветеран «Альфы».
Удивление бывшего бойца спецподразделения вызвал и тот факт, что президент Франции Франсуа Олланд прибыл на место бойни спустя очень короткий промежуток времени. По мнению Шевчука, служба безопасности президента допустить подобное не имела права, поскольку жизнь главы государства находилась бы в опасности.
> После влажного теракта в Минском метро, Батька тоже приехал очень быстро. товарищ майор привет.
— Кроме того, практически сразу прозвучали обвинения, что в проведении теракта виноваты мусульмане. И это при том, что люди были в масках, их лиц никто не видел. Однако полиция всем объявила, кто именно виноват в случившемся, — подытожил Игорь Шевчук.
Эксперт уверен, что подобные резонансные преступления совершаются не спонтанно и не случайными людьми.
— Я вас уверяю, весь этот процесс управляемый, и не исключено, что в связке может оказаться и Украина. Возможно, в скором времени мы увидим террористические акты на Украине, а Запад объявит, что Украина является рассадником терроризма и для усиления борьбы понадобятся некоторые действия, которые уже можно прогнозировать, — сказал Шевчук.
По словам эксперта, реакция на произошедшую трагедию лишний раз подчеркнула политику двойных стандартов, которой придерживается Запад. Политики и общественность на смерть французских карикатуристов отреагировали куда более эмоционально, чем на гибель российских журналистов на Украине, а теракт в Париже вызвал куда больший резонанс, чем нападение боевиков на Дом печати в Грозном 4 декабря, когда в противостоянии с бандитами погибли 15 чеченских силовиков.
Отметим, что Шевчук не единственный российский эксперт, кто обратил внимание на нестыковки в обстоятельствах парижского теракта. Политолог Алексей Мартынов уверен, что террористы не стали бы несколько лет вынашивать план мести за карикатуры, опубликованные в журнале Charlie Hebdo, а действовали бы импульсивно. По словам политолога, террористический акт в Париже удовлетворяет интересам США и велика вероятность, что он был спланирован американскими спецслужбами.
Напомним, 7 января двое преступников в масках ворвались в редакцию французского сатирического журнала Charlie Hebdo, где в тот момент проводилась редакционная планерка. Из автоматов они застрелили 11 человек, среди которых были сотрудники и посетители редакции, а также двое полицейских. Позднее от ран скончалась еще одна жертва кровавой бойни. После этого террористы беспрепятственно покинули место преступления на черном «ситроене».
> В одной из брошенных машин (вероятно, в черном «cитроене»), которым воспользовались террористы, полицейские также обнаружили удостоверение на имя Саида Куаши.
Паспорт бабаха из боинга_11сентября.жпг
Толстый потчерк Моссада.
Паспорт бабаха из боинга_11сентября.жпг
Толстый потчерк Моссада.
Возможно, но хоть дома не повзрывали.
>Терракт
http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2644284
Ну и что вы думаете теперь?
Высокопоставленный сотрудник полиции, принимавший участие в расследовании дела о теракте в штаб-квартире французского сатирического еженедельника Charlie Hebdo, совершил самоубийство, передает 10 января «РИА Новости». Комиссар Эльрик Фреду (Helric Fredou) был обнаружен мертвым в своем кабинете во французском городе Лимож. Мужчина в возрасте 45 лет застрелился из табельного оружия в ночь на 10 января. Как и многие другие сотрудники полиции, Фреду накануне самоубийства работал по делу о нападении на Charlie Hebdo. В частности, он опрашивал семью одного из погибших. Комиссар свел счеты с жизнью еще до того, как завершил подготовку отчета. По данным профсоюза, комиссар находился в депрессивном настроении.
Подробнее: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2644284
Ну и что вы думаете теперь?
Высокопоставленный сотрудник полиции, принимавший участие в расследовании дела о теракте в штаб-квартире французского сатирического еженедельника Charlie Hebdo, совершил самоубийство, передает 10 января «РИА Новости». Комиссар Эльрик Фреду (Helric Fredou) был обнаружен мертвым в своем кабинете во французском городе Лимож. Мужчина в возрасте 45 лет застрелился из табельного оружия в ночь на 10 января. Как и многие другие сотрудники полиции, Фреду накануне самоубийства работал по делу о нападении на Charlie Hebdo. В частности, он опрашивал семью одного из погибших. Комиссар свел счеты с жизнью еще до того, как завершил подготовку отчета. По данным профсоюза, комиссар находился в депрессивном настроении.
Подробнее: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2644284
С тремя р надо или что?
Ну че там годного навскрывали? По телеку опять о войне с терроризмом пиздят. Прям 11 сентября завоняло.
ингриш, разбор полетов.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUuYSft1fOw&bpctr=1420950345 пока еще не выпилили.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUuYSft1fOw&bpctr=1420950345 пока еще не выпилили.
>Даже уже сам чистый еврей французский презик с фамилией Голланд (ну это как в России еврей с фамилией Поляк), в ужасе срочно летит и встречается с Путиным в аэропорту Внуково, прямо в терминале. "Французский президент сообщил президенту Путину об американском плане полученным французским минобороны о ЯДЕРНОМ фальшфлаге (!) готовящемся американским правительством Обамы во Франции и который будет свален на Россию, чтобы начать с ней войну"
http://www.zarubezhom.com
http://www.zarubezhom.com
Бугага.
Где-то в апокалиптических прогнозах мусолится эта тема давно. Возвращение всех евреев на родину перед приходом Мошиаха.
Пролистал это немножко лайвинтернет/users/iisail/rubric/5399057/ , очень много картинок, а начинается все с изысканий насчет главного каббалиста Рава Кадури, который сказал что Шарон последний премьер перед Мошиахом. Кадури жиды верят.
http://levhudoi блогспот com/2011/06/blog-post_06.html
Где-то в апокалиптических прогнозах мусолится эта тема давно. Возвращение всех евреев на родину перед приходом Мошиаха.
Пролистал это немножко лайвинтернет/users/iisail/rubric/5399057/ , очень много картинок, а начинается все с изысканий насчет главного каббалиста Рава Кадури, который сказал что Шарон последний премьер перед Мошиахом. Кадури жиды верят.
http://levhudoi блогспот com/2011/06/blog-post_06.html
Внезапно сходится. Дроны, французские АЭС, десятки случаев.
Террористический акт.
Нахуй иди.
Не траль плиз. Я же опхуй и риал неправильно написал. Не будем всрывать эту тему с буквами ок?, у нас тут АЭС могут бомбануть.
And second, a very interesting remark is that "Charlie" in hebrew is a perfect anagram to "Israel " !
I dont know if the forum will allow such characters, let's try :
שארלי = Charlie
ישראל = Israel
So, "Je suis Charlie" could also mean "Je suis Israël"
So my wonderings about all of that is : all these emotions, all this "je suis charlie" initiative, which was NOT a public initiative, wasn't it a kind of major worlwide ritual, kind of energy extraction from all the human robots who took part of the "je suis charlie" initiative, with the last part played in the Paris synagogue ?
I dont know if the forum will allow such characters, let's try :
שארלי = Charlie
ישראל = Israel
So, "Je suis Charlie" could also mean "Je suis Israël"
So my wonderings about all of that is : all these emotions, all this "je suis charlie" initiative, which was NOT a public initiative, wasn't it a kind of major worlwide ritual, kind of energy extraction from all the human robots who took part of the "je suis charlie" initiative, with the last part played in the Paris synagogue ?
ОП почти попал, но мотивы жиддупсихопатов немного другие. Субботняя сессия КС. Кто умеет в английский могут почитать, кто хочет по русски может подождать, хейтер ебущий мамок контактеров может ебать руку.
(Chu) Do you want to ask about that weird thing you saw in the pool?
(L) Oh, yeah. What day was it? Was it Wednesday? It was the same day that this Charlie Hebdo thing happened, so that was Wednesday. So I was looking out the window at the guys who...
(Galatea) The mouse is crawling down.
(L) ...at the guys who were removing a stump out in the back yard. I noticed that the pool had swells, and they were big, slow, almost-entire-pool-sized swells. The water was going up and down, up and down, almost straight up and down, in a big way. It was BIG swells like you'd see on big open water long before a storm. I stood there and watched and watched and waited, because usually if the pool is doing something like that, it will calm down after 5 or 10 minutes. I watched it for at least 10 minutes or so, and I went back and looked at it again and it was still doing it 30 minutes later. Honey, you remember?
(Ark) Yes, yes.
(L) It was doing it for a long time, and it didn't stop.
(Ark) It was like, you know, being in resonance with something with frequency of 60 Hz or something like that.
(Perceval) But it didn't splash over the sides?
(L) No splashing, no wavelets. It was almost as if it had oil on top of it to keep it perfectly smooth, what mariners would call “oily swells” I think.
(Pierre) It was a very long wavelength, like 3 or 4 meters.
(L) Yeah, at least. We waited, and I was thinking maybe it was an earthquake or something like that.
(Pierre) Something in the ground?
(L) Yeah, so can you tell me what that was?
A: Activation of inner earth energies in response to events elsewhere. We have noted that your planet responds to activities on the surface. Often this is expressed as heat which results in earthquakes and/or volcanic eruptions. But it can also call forth other types of frequencies. There is another aspect that you should consider: the use of infrasound machines by secret projects to control human emotional states. Such instruments can evoke even more devastating responses from the planet and thereby the solar system.
Q: (L) So are you suggesting that this could have been... Let me just ask: Was this then the result of the use of one of these infrasound things designed to disrupt the emotional states of the people in France at the time of this Charlie Hebdo shooting?
A: Yes
Q: (L) To prime them...
(Pierre) ...for the Charlie Hebdo event?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Are you also suggesting or saying that the use of the infrasound machines in and of itself can evoke negative reactions from the planet?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And then if it evokes negative reactions from human beings, that amplifies the negative reaction from the planet?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Does that mean that France is setting itself up for some kind of cataclysmic disaster as a result of this action and subsequent behavior of the people?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) That's weird. I woke up very cheery that day!
(L) Well, long ago, you once predicted that France would experience a nuclear attack...
A: Yes
Q: (L) Uh, is that kind of like back on the table now?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Could that be natural in the form of an earthquake that causes some kind of a problem at a nuclear power station?
A: Not as likely as bringing on the fires of hell. France has chosen a very unwise direction.
Q: (Pierre) So meteorites impacting...
(L) I don't think they necessarily mean meteorites. That can be a metaphoric expression. Do you mean specifically meteorites?
A: !? Maybe
Q: (Perceval) I mean, in the past session we talked about these drones over nuclear power plants in France, and that the French military would like to know who it is. The suggestion was that it was the Bad Guys.
(L) Has that been part of the blackmail process against France to get them to cooperate with this particular Charlie Hebdo event that just happened on Wednesday?
A: Yes
Q: (L) I guess we should get to that since that's what we've been concerned about. Is this Charlie Hebdo event a false flag operation?
A: Absolutely! All the signs are evident!
Q: (Pierre) And the motive, is it because of France's position on Russia? Is it because of France's position on Palestine...?
(L) Wait a minute, wait a minute, back up.
(Chu) What is the motive?
(L) Yeah, that's a fairly simple question. What is the motive?
A: To get France in line with Israel's survival mandate: Semites must be destroyed!
Q: (L) Basically, you're saying that Israelis are not Semitic, but Arabs for the most part are. Is that what you're saying?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) So, the objective is the destruction of Arabic population in France through a civil war?
(L) I would say so, because if you've got the destruction of the Arabic population in France, then there is no support [from outside] for the Arabic people around Israel [and they can be more easily destroyed]. Israel just wants to claim all that land – Eretz Israel, they call it.
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Destruction through civil war?
A: Expulsion, camps, similar to the treatment of the Semitic Jews by the Nazis, supported or ignored by the rest of the world.
Q: (Pierre) That's exactly what this guy Eric Zemmour, the guy who was on every French TV show, was announcing on air. He was announcing that Arabic population because they are a source of chaos should be deported. There was this big controversy around what he said. Actually, it was priming the French population to what is going to happen.
(Scottie) I think I know what the Disturbance in the Force is.
(L) What?
(Scottie) Remember I was telling you the other day that something was up? This seems like a pretty big disturbance in the Force, dontcha think?
(L) Yeah!
(Scottie) It was like a day or two before the Charlie Hebdo thing that I mentioned it.
(L) Oh yeah.
(Scottie) People here were feeling squirrelly, couldn't sleep, having headaches, bad dreams and all that stuff. Something was clearly "off"... And then: KABOOM!
(Andromeda) It's sickening.
(Pierre) Will they succeed?
A: They may achieve some progress in their plans. However they should consider the cost: We also mentioned long ago a major event in Israel.
Q: (Pierre) So, they will start to implement this plan, and then in Israel there will be such a chaos and destruction that the leaders or the bosses will disappear, and...
(L) No, you're... I mean, just think about it. Okay, they start this plan. I think that at some point, obviously... Well, I think that some leadership within the Arabic world is going to change their mind about their support of Israel and do - what do they call it? A decapitating movement, where they cut off the head of the opposition. Is that close? That's kind of what I got in my head here when the answer was coming through.
A: Very close, but more was implied than just human activities.
Q: (Perceval) When they talk about a major event a long time ago, I think it was in reference to an earthquake. You had mentioned something like there was a fault line under Israel. But maybe it's in reference to what they said previously, which was that events on the surface have effects on the planet. There may be some direct link there...
(Chu) Do you want to ask about that weird thing you saw in the pool?
(L) Oh, yeah. What day was it? Was it Wednesday? It was the same day that this Charlie Hebdo thing happened, so that was Wednesday. So I was looking out the window at the guys who...
(Galatea) The mouse is crawling down.
(L) ...at the guys who were removing a stump out in the back yard. I noticed that the pool had swells, and they were big, slow, almost-entire-pool-sized swells. The water was going up and down, up and down, almost straight up and down, in a big way. It was BIG swells like you'd see on big open water long before a storm. I stood there and watched and watched and waited, because usually if the pool is doing something like that, it will calm down after 5 or 10 minutes. I watched it for at least 10 minutes or so, and I went back and looked at it again and it was still doing it 30 minutes later. Honey, you remember?
(Ark) Yes, yes.
(L) It was doing it for a long time, and it didn't stop.
(Ark) It was like, you know, being in resonance with something with frequency of 60 Hz or something like that.
(Perceval) But it didn't splash over the sides?
(L) No splashing, no wavelets. It was almost as if it had oil on top of it to keep it perfectly smooth, what mariners would call “oily swells” I think.
(Pierre) It was a very long wavelength, like 3 or 4 meters.
(L) Yeah, at least. We waited, and I was thinking maybe it was an earthquake or something like that.
(Pierre) Something in the ground?
(L) Yeah, so can you tell me what that was?
A: Activation of inner earth energies in response to events elsewhere. We have noted that your planet responds to activities on the surface. Often this is expressed as heat which results in earthquakes and/or volcanic eruptions. But it can also call forth other types of frequencies. There is another aspect that you should consider: the use of infrasound machines by secret projects to control human emotional states. Such instruments can evoke even more devastating responses from the planet and thereby the solar system.
Q: (L) So are you suggesting that this could have been... Let me just ask: Was this then the result of the use of one of these infrasound things designed to disrupt the emotional states of the people in France at the time of this Charlie Hebdo shooting?
A: Yes
Q: (L) To prime them...
(Pierre) ...for the Charlie Hebdo event?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Are you also suggesting or saying that the use of the infrasound machines in and of itself can evoke negative reactions from the planet?
A: Yes
Q: (L) And then if it evokes negative reactions from human beings, that amplifies the negative reaction from the planet?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Does that mean that France is setting itself up for some kind of cataclysmic disaster as a result of this action and subsequent behavior of the people?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) That's weird. I woke up very cheery that day!
(L) Well, long ago, you once predicted that France would experience a nuclear attack...
A: Yes
Q: (L) Uh, is that kind of like back on the table now?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Could that be natural in the form of an earthquake that causes some kind of a problem at a nuclear power station?
A: Not as likely as bringing on the fires of hell. France has chosen a very unwise direction.
Q: (Pierre) So meteorites impacting...
(L) I don't think they necessarily mean meteorites. That can be a metaphoric expression. Do you mean specifically meteorites?
A: !? Maybe
Q: (Perceval) I mean, in the past session we talked about these drones over nuclear power plants in France, and that the French military would like to know who it is. The suggestion was that it was the Bad Guys.
(L) Has that been part of the blackmail process against France to get them to cooperate with this particular Charlie Hebdo event that just happened on Wednesday?
A: Yes
Q: (L) I guess we should get to that since that's what we've been concerned about. Is this Charlie Hebdo event a false flag operation?
A: Absolutely! All the signs are evident!
Q: (Pierre) And the motive, is it because of France's position on Russia? Is it because of France's position on Palestine...?
(L) Wait a minute, wait a minute, back up.
(Chu) What is the motive?
(L) Yeah, that's a fairly simple question. What is the motive?
A: To get France in line with Israel's survival mandate: Semites must be destroyed!
Q: (L) Basically, you're saying that Israelis are not Semitic, but Arabs for the most part are. Is that what you're saying?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) So, the objective is the destruction of Arabic population in France through a civil war?
(L) I would say so, because if you've got the destruction of the Arabic population in France, then there is no support [from outside] for the Arabic people around Israel [and they can be more easily destroyed]. Israel just wants to claim all that land – Eretz Israel, they call it.
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Destruction through civil war?
A: Expulsion, camps, similar to the treatment of the Semitic Jews by the Nazis, supported or ignored by the rest of the world.
Q: (Pierre) That's exactly what this guy Eric Zemmour, the guy who was on every French TV show, was announcing on air. He was announcing that Arabic population because they are a source of chaos should be deported. There was this big controversy around what he said. Actually, it was priming the French population to what is going to happen.
(Scottie) I think I know what the Disturbance in the Force is.
(L) What?
(Scottie) Remember I was telling you the other day that something was up? This seems like a pretty big disturbance in the Force, dontcha think?
(L) Yeah!
(Scottie) It was like a day or two before the Charlie Hebdo thing that I mentioned it.
(L) Oh yeah.
(Scottie) People here were feeling squirrelly, couldn't sleep, having headaches, bad dreams and all that stuff. Something was clearly "off"... And then: KABOOM!
(Andromeda) It's sickening.
(Pierre) Will they succeed?
A: They may achieve some progress in their plans. However they should consider the cost: We also mentioned long ago a major event in Israel.
Q: (Pierre) So, they will start to implement this plan, and then in Israel there will be such a chaos and destruction that the leaders or the bosses will disappear, and...
(L) No, you're... I mean, just think about it. Okay, they start this plan. I think that at some point, obviously... Well, I think that some leadership within the Arabic world is going to change their mind about their support of Israel and do - what do they call it? A decapitating movement, where they cut off the head of the opposition. Is that close? That's kind of what I got in my head here when the answer was coming through.
A: Very close, but more was implied than just human activities.
Q: (Perceval) When they talk about a major event a long time ago, I think it was in reference to an earthquake. You had mentioned something like there was a fault line under Israel. But maybe it's in reference to what they said previously, which was that events on the surface have effects on the planet. There may be some direct link there...
(L) So Israel is turning itself into its own vortex.
(Perceval) The more they destroy, the more they bring on the day where the planet will respond and destroy Israel. You're meant to live in harmony with the planet and everything on it. If you're a chief evildoer...
(L) And if France is supporting this, it will probably suffer some collateral damage, at least...
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Ya know there's a nuclear power plant close to where we live.
(L) Yes, I know.
(Chu) And the Toulouse people are most aligned with this whole Israel thing according to the news today.
(Perceval) The two brothers in the Charlie Hebdo shooting, the two brothers, were they the shooters?
A: No. [Wood stove bottom door falls open, making a big noise] They were already "on ice."
Q: (Perceval) Does that mean they were already dead?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) So, um...
(Chu) And the third guy, too?
(Perceval) So they were already dead. Were they placed in this print house near Paris? Were their bodies put in that building?
A: This was a multi-act drama.
Q: (L) When they supposedly killed the brothers and took them out, were they displayed?
(Chu) Not at all. Nothing was displayed.
(L) Did anybody see their faces?
(Chu) No.
(Pierre) No.
(Kniall) No.
(L) Do we even know that they were dead when they were supposedly shot and taken out?
(Perceval) No, nobody knows that. You never know that anyway.
(Pierre) The only thing you know about them is their names, and pictures of them.
(Perceval) Lemme ask a question: Was there anybody in that print house playing the part of these brothers?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) So there were some "actors" there playing the part?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Were they killed?
A: No
Q: (Perceval) They escaped, or they were arrested? Were they arrested? Did anybody arrest them?
(Kniall) They were wearing uniforms so they blended in.
(Pierre) Fake shootings.
(Chu) Were they RAID agents?
(L) What's RAID?
(Chu) The special agents that killed Merah. [RAID = Recherche Assistance Intervention Dissuasion, the anti-terrorist unit of the French Police]
A: Close.
Q: (L) Now, we need to get something straight here. We had a grocery store...
(Perceval) Two brothers ended up in a print house north of Paris. The two brothers who supposedly shot up Charlie Hebdo...
(L) Okay, they were in the print shop.
(Perceval) Another guy who supposedly was associated with them went to a Kosher grocery store in Paris and had hostages. Simultaneously, more or less, they raided both of them and killed all three of them.
(L) Okay, but nobody ever saw anybody being taken out, nobody ever saw any faces, so they could have just had actors in there who were...?
(Chu) Well, on the grocery store, you see one guy in the same kind of uniform as the special forces being shot.
(L) You assume you see him being shot.
(Perceval) You don't see him being shot and dropping to the ground.
(Chu) So what about the third guy? Did he kill the police woman the first day?
A: No
Q: (Chu) Was he at the grocery store?
A: No
Q: (Perceval) Who was the guy who took hostages in the grocery store?
A: Agent!
Q: (Chu) Was the third guy already killed a week ago like the brothers?
A: Not a week.
Q: (L) I would say they probably had them in custody and killed them right before...
(Pierre) They needed them fresh.
(Perceval) And then they just present their bodies after the fact.
(Pierre) So this guy running out of the grocery, he wasn't shot.
(Perceval) Exactly. That's why they froze the video. I dunno if they're shooting blanks, but one of the guys ran in on his own.
(Pierre) There was an agent inside.
(Perceval) So they put the smoke in, and then the guy who was actually the hostage taker with the balaclava and stuff runs out, he's got more or less the same gear on as the rest of them, he mingles in the crowd, takes his balaclava off, and hey! I'm a cop! And nobody knows.
(Chu) Well, you see him kind of walk like the V for Vendetta scene where the guy says, "Don't shoot!", and you don't see the shot but he falls. Then a minute later, you see a body coming out and the news people are saying that the police are taking out a body.
(Pierre) So that guy running out of the Hypercacher store, did they kill him?
A: No
Q: (Chu) But the hostages have to have been real.
(Pierre) Oh yeah!
(L) You know what it makes me think of? Remember that incident down south near Toulouse where they had that shooting exercise, and it was supposed to be blanks, but it was live ammunition?
(Pierre) No, in Carcassonne.
(L) Yeah, that's it. It's almost like somewhere around they're practicing these kinds of things. They're training for these kinds of operations.
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) When you say "agents", are these people part of the French military or intelligence establishment?
A: Above that, connected to Mossad.
Q: (Perceval) So it's like an Israeli or Mossad fifth column within the French intelligence services.
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) So most of the police involved with this...
(L) ...are innocent!
(Perceval) Yeah, most of the police involved think that it's real!
A: Yes
Q: (Kniall) How about that cop in Limoges that committed suicide?
(Perceval) Before that, can we just clear up one thing? The policeman outside on the street on video, he was really shot?
A: Yes
(Perceval) The more they destroy, the more they bring on the day where the planet will respond and destroy Israel. You're meant to live in harmony with the planet and everything on it. If you're a chief evildoer...
(L) And if France is supporting this, it will probably suffer some collateral damage, at least...
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Ya know there's a nuclear power plant close to where we live.
(L) Yes, I know.
(Chu) And the Toulouse people are most aligned with this whole Israel thing according to the news today.
(Perceval) The two brothers in the Charlie Hebdo shooting, the two brothers, were they the shooters?
A: No. [Wood stove bottom door falls open, making a big noise] They were already "on ice."
Q: (Perceval) Does that mean they were already dead?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) So, um...
(Chu) And the third guy, too?
(Perceval) So they were already dead. Were they placed in this print house near Paris? Were their bodies put in that building?
A: This was a multi-act drama.
Q: (L) When they supposedly killed the brothers and took them out, were they displayed?
(Chu) Not at all. Nothing was displayed.
(L) Did anybody see their faces?
(Chu) No.
(Pierre) No.
(Kniall) No.
(L) Do we even know that they were dead when they were supposedly shot and taken out?
(Perceval) No, nobody knows that. You never know that anyway.
(Pierre) The only thing you know about them is their names, and pictures of them.
(Perceval) Lemme ask a question: Was there anybody in that print house playing the part of these brothers?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) So there were some "actors" there playing the part?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) Were they killed?
A: No
Q: (Perceval) They escaped, or they were arrested? Were they arrested? Did anybody arrest them?
(Kniall) They were wearing uniforms so they blended in.
(Pierre) Fake shootings.
(Chu) Were they RAID agents?
(L) What's RAID?
(Chu) The special agents that killed Merah. [RAID = Recherche Assistance Intervention Dissuasion, the anti-terrorist unit of the French Police]
A: Close.
Q: (L) Now, we need to get something straight here. We had a grocery store...
(Perceval) Two brothers ended up in a print house north of Paris. The two brothers who supposedly shot up Charlie Hebdo...
(L) Okay, they were in the print shop.
(Perceval) Another guy who supposedly was associated with them went to a Kosher grocery store in Paris and had hostages. Simultaneously, more or less, they raided both of them and killed all three of them.
(L) Okay, but nobody ever saw anybody being taken out, nobody ever saw any faces, so they could have just had actors in there who were...?
(Chu) Well, on the grocery store, you see one guy in the same kind of uniform as the special forces being shot.
(L) You assume you see him being shot.
(Perceval) You don't see him being shot and dropping to the ground.
(Chu) So what about the third guy? Did he kill the police woman the first day?
A: No
Q: (Chu) Was he at the grocery store?
A: No
Q: (Perceval) Who was the guy who took hostages in the grocery store?
A: Agent!
Q: (Chu) Was the third guy already killed a week ago like the brothers?
A: Not a week.
Q: (L) I would say they probably had them in custody and killed them right before...
(Pierre) They needed them fresh.
(Perceval) And then they just present their bodies after the fact.
(Pierre) So this guy running out of the grocery, he wasn't shot.
(Perceval) Exactly. That's why they froze the video. I dunno if they're shooting blanks, but one of the guys ran in on his own.
(Pierre) There was an agent inside.
(Perceval) So they put the smoke in, and then the guy who was actually the hostage taker with the balaclava and stuff runs out, he's got more or less the same gear on as the rest of them, he mingles in the crowd, takes his balaclava off, and hey! I'm a cop! And nobody knows.
(Chu) Well, you see him kind of walk like the V for Vendetta scene where the guy says, "Don't shoot!", and you don't see the shot but he falls. Then a minute later, you see a body coming out and the news people are saying that the police are taking out a body.
(Pierre) So that guy running out of the Hypercacher store, did they kill him?
A: No
Q: (Chu) But the hostages have to have been real.
(Pierre) Oh yeah!
(L) You know what it makes me think of? Remember that incident down south near Toulouse where they had that shooting exercise, and it was supposed to be blanks, but it was live ammunition?
(Pierre) No, in Carcassonne.
(L) Yeah, that's it. It's almost like somewhere around they're practicing these kinds of things. They're training for these kinds of operations.
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) When you say "agents", are these people part of the French military or intelligence establishment?
A: Above that, connected to Mossad.
Q: (Perceval) So it's like an Israeli or Mossad fifth column within the French intelligence services.
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) So most of the police involved with this...
(L) ...are innocent!
(Perceval) Yeah, most of the police involved think that it's real!
A: Yes
Q: (Kniall) How about that cop in Limoges that committed suicide?
(Perceval) Before that, can we just clear up one thing? The policeman outside on the street on video, he was really shot?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So they really kill people. The killing of people is NOT fake!
A: Indeed!
Q: (Perceval) This guy in Limoges who was 3rd in command in the Limoges Police Judiciare, immediately after the Charlie Hebdo affair, he was working on the case somehow even though Limoges is quite far away, and he apparently committed suicide. Did he?
(L) So, in other words, he was "suicided"?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Because he was about to talk?
(L) Because he wasn't willing to participate in this charade...
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) A couple of years before in the same department in Limoges, this guy's predecessor, he also committed suicide, and it is this guy who recently died that found him!
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) The guy who "committed suicide" a few days ago was the one who found his predecessor's body in the same department, who also supposedly committed suicide.
(Pierre) Did the predecessor really commit suicide?
A: No
Q: (Chu) What's going on in Limoges?
A: There is so much corruption at higher levels that the regular police have to work hard to remain "ignorant."
Q: (Perceval) There's nowhere to look where you won't see something.
(L) And they need to remain ignorant to stay alive if they don't want to be part of it.
A: Yes
Q: (Kniall) It means the cops here are dangerous.
(L) Well, that's a given.
(Pierre) Some of them.
(L) Yeah, some of them. Some of them are IN danger. It's like anywhere.
(Pierre) Surrounded by corruption.
(L) Undoubtedly there are many cops in the job because it's a good job to have, and they want to serve.
(Perceval) So, it's kind of a given then that Hollande and Manuel Valls and the people at that level don't know anything about this. They're not aware of the false flag nature of this attack. They think it's real. Is that true?
A: Only partly. They are scripted in their responses by "advisers."
Q: (Pierre) Well, it's very bad. Concentration camps, deportation...
(Perceval) I don't think we'll get there, though.
(Chu) Were all the people that were allegedly killed at the Charlie Hebdo building, were they all actually killed?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) They kill real people.
(Chu) I was just wondering if the Jewish guy had survived.
A: One of the keys to Mossad involvement is that Jews die.
Q: (L) So they're very much into killing their own.
(Perceval) Absolutely. So, kind of the lack of police on the streets and the ease of the getaway after the Charlie Hebdo thing, that was facilitated by these people who plotted the whole thing. They were able to keep police away.
(L) If they have fifth column type things, they can direct the traffic so to speak.
(Pierre) The police not answering the phone calls...
(L) You just get a key person here or there, and they just direct the traffic. Anything else?
(Ark) I have a question. Are we supposed to publish it all?
(L) Publish this session?
(Ark) Yes.
A: Why not?
Q: (L) Others are already saying it.
(Pierre) Yeah, they are already saying civil war, demonizing Jews for a false flag attack, Mossad business...
(Chu) They can try and sue the C's if they want to.
(Kniall) The thing is, it's already been put out there.
(L) The C's aren't really saying anything that already hasn't been said by somebody else.
(Pierre) Well, I hope something will happen soon so this deportation business and that kind of thing doesn't happen soon. That's what I wish. It's terrible!
A: Help is on the way!
Q: (Galatea) Did you ever ask them when it's going to come? When?!
A: Wait and see!
Q: [laughter] (Galatea) Can we get a small time frame? Like, within less than 10 years?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Oh, great! Yeah, before 2025. Woohoo! [laughter]
(Chu) Help as in comets? People?
(L) I have the feeling that it's comets...
A: Close!
Q: (L) Well, there were two things that actually have been said in previous sessions. One thing was when we were talking about volcanic eruptions, and the remark was made that what happens if all the volcanoes go off at once. Is this something like what's coming up?
A: Very warm! [Ha-ha!]
Q: (L) And it was also said that programmed people, who were programmed to go off and become shooters upon certain signals, were all going to go off at once at some point. I guess what we're seeing now is something like that part, and...
(Perceval) Is it possible that these mind-controlled, programmed people like you're talking about, that they could be activated by some natural frequencies when it's not expected?
A: Indeed! Won't that be interesting?
Q: (Pierre) Shootings everywhere?
(Perceval) Not just shootings, but these people are kept in close proximity to their handlers, or their handlers keep an eye on them. They don't know that they're mind-programmed assassins. You could end up having one of them suddenly offing presidents and other officials.
(Pierre) Like Frankenstein's monster killing off its creator!
(Perceval) Yeah.
(L) It's kind of like the movie The Manchurian Candidate. Except they go rogue. And the possibilities of them going rogue apparently are there. Well, alrighty then. I guess...
(Perceval) Can I ask one question about the Rig Vedas?
(L) Yeah.
(Perceval) The mention of flying ships, and flying to other planets, did you ask about that?
(L) Yeah, we asked about that. They talked about nuclear war and all that. Flying machines and all that stuff.
(Perceval) Atlantis.
(L) Some of it could also have been descriptions of comets.
A: Both.
Q: (L) Alright then. Unless there's something we need to know, or something that we should have asked that we didn't ask, consider it asked. Eeeh, I try it every time and they never give it to me!
(Andromeda) Maybe one day!
A: You are doing well. Goodbye.
END OF SESSION
(Scottie) Did you see that video of this blonde French woman who was basically saying that it's time for people to stop saying, "Don't go too far with this whole 'beware Islamophobia' thing?"
(Chu) Yeah, she said that people are making a mistake by talking about not mixing extremist Muslims with normal Muslims because it's all in the Koran, and they're all the same. She's just spreading hatred.
(Pierre) What Zemmour said was that the Koran is just an extremist ideology...
(L) So is the Old Testament!!
(Andromeda) Yeah! I mean it all depends on individual interpretation.
(Pierre) Most Muslims are like most Christians and Jews: normal, nice people.
(Perceval) It's such a dirty thing to do.
(Pierre) And what are we going to do if they start deporting people, taking them away?
(Perceval) Well, it may not get to that.
(Pierre) But they say "camps"...
(Kniall) That's the plan, but...
(L) They're trying to have a damn rally like the Nuremberg rallies tomorrow! It's crazy.
(Pierre) It's more like Kristallnacht. Imagine being a German in 1933. What do you do?
(Perceval) They talked a long time ago about the re-creation, a second run, and that Nazi Germany was a test run. But, we shouldn't assume that the exact same thing will happen. Conditions are kind of different now.
(L) They did learn a few things, and they have different technology.
(Perceval) The problem is that you have a reference. Before Nazi Germany, there wasn't anything that people could refer to and say, "Never again!" But now there is, so it's more difficult to recreate Nazi Germany in a blatant, overt way. So, they have to be more covert and more subtle, ya know what I mean?
(L) They have to portray Muslims as violent terrorists instead of portraying them as destroying the economy because they're money grubbers as the Nazis depicted the Jews.
(Ark) But you all forget that France is still a member of the European Union. So, if they start something like mass deportations or camps, then of course there is a European Parliament, and they will condemn France. Nothing happened like that yet in other European countries.
(Pierre) Maybe other countries will follow, because Germany is starting to propagate similar statements...
(Perceval) But there was a big opposition rally to that, as well.
(L) They had an anti-anti-Muslim rally!
(Perceval) That kind of a pogrom against Muslims could only happen in conditions where everything had totally fallen apart.
(Kniall) Or if it had become a Europe-wide thing. This stuff is going on in the Netherlands, Germany, the UK...
(Perceval) They're trying hard to provoke, but it's difficult to provoke it. They have to resort to the right-wing racists, basically. They have to look to them to whip up the anti-Arab sentiments. I mean, look at what they have to do to create that sentiment in the general population: they have to slaughter people! And it's so dubious. They can't even find 2 Arabs in France to go shoot up a flagrantly racist magazine office! They have to do a secret op and fake it! And the response of most people is that these are just a couple of nutjobs. It's hard to get white Westerners to say that all Muslims are evil.
(Ark) But there is also another reason why I think it's not gonna work the way you think. For instance, in Germany, this mass hysteria worked because the Nazis were promising economic things. And THAT'S what made people to follow the stupidity and forget about thinking. They were in such an economical state that anything was better if it was introducing order again. Now, in France, they can only go economically WORSE.
(Perceval) Yeah, they'd have to destroy the economy Europe-wide first, and then people might be more amenable to hard-line politics to "solve the problem".
(Ark) So, for me, all that looks like, okay, Hollande was falling down, falling down, economy is falling down, falling down, and we need to distract people with something else. For awhile, it will work. But the economy will not improve, okay, so it's not gonna work.
(Perceval) And then there's the wildcard of natural events...
- END -
A: Indeed!
Q: (Perceval) This guy in Limoges who was 3rd in command in the Limoges Police Judiciare, immediately after the Charlie Hebdo affair, he was working on the case somehow even though Limoges is quite far away, and he apparently committed suicide. Did he?
(L) So, in other words, he was "suicided"?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Because he was about to talk?
(L) Because he wasn't willing to participate in this charade...
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) A couple of years before in the same department in Limoges, this guy's predecessor, he also committed suicide, and it is this guy who recently died that found him!
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) The guy who "committed suicide" a few days ago was the one who found his predecessor's body in the same department, who also supposedly committed suicide.
(Pierre) Did the predecessor really commit suicide?
A: No
Q: (Chu) What's going on in Limoges?
A: There is so much corruption at higher levels that the regular police have to work hard to remain "ignorant."
Q: (Perceval) There's nowhere to look where you won't see something.
(L) And they need to remain ignorant to stay alive if they don't want to be part of it.
A: Yes
Q: (Kniall) It means the cops here are dangerous.
(L) Well, that's a given.
(Pierre) Some of them.
(L) Yeah, some of them. Some of them are IN danger. It's like anywhere.
(Pierre) Surrounded by corruption.
(L) Undoubtedly there are many cops in the job because it's a good job to have, and they want to serve.
(Perceval) So, it's kind of a given then that Hollande and Manuel Valls and the people at that level don't know anything about this. They're not aware of the false flag nature of this attack. They think it's real. Is that true?
A: Only partly. They are scripted in their responses by "advisers."
Q: (Pierre) Well, it's very bad. Concentration camps, deportation...
(Perceval) I don't think we'll get there, though.
(Chu) Were all the people that were allegedly killed at the Charlie Hebdo building, were they all actually killed?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) They kill real people.
(Chu) I was just wondering if the Jewish guy had survived.
A: One of the keys to Mossad involvement is that Jews die.
Q: (L) So they're very much into killing their own.
(Perceval) Absolutely. So, kind of the lack of police on the streets and the ease of the getaway after the Charlie Hebdo thing, that was facilitated by these people who plotted the whole thing. They were able to keep police away.
(L) If they have fifth column type things, they can direct the traffic so to speak.
(Pierre) The police not answering the phone calls...
(L) You just get a key person here or there, and they just direct the traffic. Anything else?
(Ark) I have a question. Are we supposed to publish it all?
(L) Publish this session?
(Ark) Yes.
A: Why not?
Q: (L) Others are already saying it.
(Pierre) Yeah, they are already saying civil war, demonizing Jews for a false flag attack, Mossad business...
(Chu) They can try and sue the C's if they want to.
(Kniall) The thing is, it's already been put out there.
(L) The C's aren't really saying anything that already hasn't been said by somebody else.
(Pierre) Well, I hope something will happen soon so this deportation business and that kind of thing doesn't happen soon. That's what I wish. It's terrible!
A: Help is on the way!
Q: (Galatea) Did you ever ask them when it's going to come? When?!
A: Wait and see!
Q: [laughter] (Galatea) Can we get a small time frame? Like, within less than 10 years?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Oh, great! Yeah, before 2025. Woohoo! [laughter]
(Chu) Help as in comets? People?
(L) I have the feeling that it's comets...
A: Close!
Q: (L) Well, there were two things that actually have been said in previous sessions. One thing was when we were talking about volcanic eruptions, and the remark was made that what happens if all the volcanoes go off at once. Is this something like what's coming up?
A: Very warm! [Ha-ha!]
Q: (L) And it was also said that programmed people, who were programmed to go off and become shooters upon certain signals, were all going to go off at once at some point. I guess what we're seeing now is something like that part, and...
(Perceval) Is it possible that these mind-controlled, programmed people like you're talking about, that they could be activated by some natural frequencies when it's not expected?
A: Indeed! Won't that be interesting?
Q: (Pierre) Shootings everywhere?
(Perceval) Not just shootings, but these people are kept in close proximity to their handlers, or their handlers keep an eye on them. They don't know that they're mind-programmed assassins. You could end up having one of them suddenly offing presidents and other officials.
(Pierre) Like Frankenstein's monster killing off its creator!
(Perceval) Yeah.
(L) It's kind of like the movie The Manchurian Candidate. Except they go rogue. And the possibilities of them going rogue apparently are there. Well, alrighty then. I guess...
(Perceval) Can I ask one question about the Rig Vedas?
(L) Yeah.
(Perceval) The mention of flying ships, and flying to other planets, did you ask about that?
(L) Yeah, we asked about that. They talked about nuclear war and all that. Flying machines and all that stuff.
(Perceval) Atlantis.
(L) Some of it could also have been descriptions of comets.
A: Both.
Q: (L) Alright then. Unless there's something we need to know, or something that we should have asked that we didn't ask, consider it asked. Eeeh, I try it every time and they never give it to me!
(Andromeda) Maybe one day!
A: You are doing well. Goodbye.
END OF SESSION
(Scottie) Did you see that video of this blonde French woman who was basically saying that it's time for people to stop saying, "Don't go too far with this whole 'beware Islamophobia' thing?"
(Chu) Yeah, she said that people are making a mistake by talking about not mixing extremist Muslims with normal Muslims because it's all in the Koran, and they're all the same. She's just spreading hatred.
(Pierre) What Zemmour said was that the Koran is just an extremist ideology...
(L) So is the Old Testament!!
(Andromeda) Yeah! I mean it all depends on individual interpretation.
(Pierre) Most Muslims are like most Christians and Jews: normal, nice people.
(Perceval) It's such a dirty thing to do.
(Pierre) And what are we going to do if they start deporting people, taking them away?
(Perceval) Well, it may not get to that.
(Pierre) But they say "camps"...
(Kniall) That's the plan, but...
(L) They're trying to have a damn rally like the Nuremberg rallies tomorrow! It's crazy.
(Pierre) It's more like Kristallnacht. Imagine being a German in 1933. What do you do?
(Perceval) They talked a long time ago about the re-creation, a second run, and that Nazi Germany was a test run. But, we shouldn't assume that the exact same thing will happen. Conditions are kind of different now.
(L) They did learn a few things, and they have different technology.
(Perceval) The problem is that you have a reference. Before Nazi Germany, there wasn't anything that people could refer to and say, "Never again!" But now there is, so it's more difficult to recreate Nazi Germany in a blatant, overt way. So, they have to be more covert and more subtle, ya know what I mean?
(L) They have to portray Muslims as violent terrorists instead of portraying them as destroying the economy because they're money grubbers as the Nazis depicted the Jews.
(Ark) But you all forget that France is still a member of the European Union. So, if they start something like mass deportations or camps, then of course there is a European Parliament, and they will condemn France. Nothing happened like that yet in other European countries.
(Pierre) Maybe other countries will follow, because Germany is starting to propagate similar statements...
(Perceval) But there was a big opposition rally to that, as well.
(L) They had an anti-anti-Muslim rally!
(Perceval) That kind of a pogrom against Muslims could only happen in conditions where everything had totally fallen apart.
(Kniall) Or if it had become a Europe-wide thing. This stuff is going on in the Netherlands, Germany, the UK...
(Perceval) They're trying hard to provoke, but it's difficult to provoke it. They have to resort to the right-wing racists, basically. They have to look to them to whip up the anti-Arab sentiments. I mean, look at what they have to do to create that sentiment in the general population: they have to slaughter people! And it's so dubious. They can't even find 2 Arabs in France to go shoot up a flagrantly racist magazine office! They have to do a secret op and fake it! And the response of most people is that these are just a couple of nutjobs. It's hard to get white Westerners to say that all Muslims are evil.
(Ark) But there is also another reason why I think it's not gonna work the way you think. For instance, in Germany, this mass hysteria worked because the Nazis were promising economic things. And THAT'S what made people to follow the stupidity and forget about thinking. They were in such an economical state that anything was better if it was introducing order again. Now, in France, they can only go economically WORSE.
(Perceval) Yeah, they'd have to destroy the economy Europe-wide first, and then people might be more amenable to hard-line politics to "solve the problem".
(Ark) So, for me, all that looks like, okay, Hollande was falling down, falling down, economy is falling down, falling down, and we need to distract people with something else. For awhile, it will work. But the economy will not improve, okay, so it's not gonna work.
(Perceval) And then there's the wildcard of natural events...
- END -
Сидением в зогаче я прокачал свой скил настолько, что могу угадывать даты происшествий. Следующая дата:27.01.2015
>террор
>теракт
неграмотные шкальники раскрывают мировой заговор, спешите видеть
Что имеем:
ИГИЛ (см. саудиты, т.е. США).
Обвал цен на нефть, устроенный саудитами (т.е. США).
Гибель СЕО Тотал (см. Франция)
Обострение в Газе (см. Хамас, т.е. саудиты, т.е. США, также см. Израиль, т.е. США).
Вывод американских войск из Афганистана (см. Аль Каида, т.е. саудиты, т.е. США)
ЕС выступает против Израиля, США блокирует резолюцию совбеза ООН по Палестине (см. Франция).
Во Франции теракты (см. саудиты, т.е. США).
ИГИЛ взламывает Пентагон (см. США).
Итого:
Ждем в ближайшее время масштабную операцию армии США на Ближнем Востоке с целью установления контроля над энергетической безопасностью ЕС. Видимо.
ИГИЛ (см. саудиты, т.е. США).
Обвал цен на нефть, устроенный саудитами (т.е. США).
Гибель СЕО Тотал (см. Франция)
Обострение в Газе (см. Хамас, т.е. саудиты, т.е. США, также см. Израиль, т.е. США).
Вывод американских войск из Афганистана (см. Аль Каида, т.е. саудиты, т.е. США)
ЕС выступает против Израиля, США блокирует резолюцию совбеза ООН по Палестине (см. Франция).
Во Франции теракты (см. саудиты, т.е. США).
ИГИЛ взламывает Пентагон (см. США).
Итого:
Ждем в ближайшее время масштабную операцию армии США на Ближнем Востоке с целью установления контроля над энергетической безопасностью ЕС. Видимо.
> хейтер ебущий мамок контактеров может ебать руку
Я все же выебу и мамок вафлеров-контактеров, и мамку дегенерата, постящего эту хуетень в треды.
Ути пути козленочек. Ответь лучше на вопрос, 7 числа как себя чувствовали, волн с толчке не наблюдали?
(Chu) Вы хотите спросить о той странной штуке, что Вы видели в бассейне?
(L) О, да. Какой это был день? Это было в среду? Это было в тот же день, когда произошло событие с Charlie Hebdo, так, это была среда. Так, я смотрела в окно на парней кто...
(Galatea) Мышь ползет вниз.
(L)... на парней, которые вытаскивали пень на заднем дворе. Я заметила, что в бассейне были волны, и они были большими, медленными, почти размером с бассейн. Вода двигалась вверх и вниз, вверх и вниз, почти прямо вверх и вниз, очень заметно. Это были БОЛЬШИЕ валы, которые бывают на большой открытой воде перед штормом. Я стояла там и смотрела и смотрела, и ждала, потому что обычно, если в бассейне происходит что-то подобное, он успокаивается через 5 или 10 минут. Я наблюдала это приблизительно, как минимум 10 минут, и я вернулась и смотрела на это снова, и это все еще продолжалось 30 минут спустя. Дорогой, Вы помните?
(Ark) Да, да.
(L) Это происходило в течение долгого времени, и это не прекращалось.
(Ark) Это было похоже, знаете, как быть в резонансе с чем-то с частотой 60 гц или наподобие.
(Perceval) Но она не выплескивалась по сторонам?
(L) Никаких всплесков, никакой ряби. Почти, как будто на поверхности было масло, чтобы поверхность оставалась идеально гладкой, что моряки называют «масляные волны», я думаю.
(Pierre) Это была очень длинная длина волны, как 3 или 4 метра.
(L) Да, как минимум. Мы ждали, и я думала, что это может быть землетрясение или что-то подобное.
(Pierre) Что-то в земле?
(L) Да, так Вы можете сказать мне, что это было?
A: Активация внутренних энергий земли в ответ на события где-то еще. Мы отмечали, что ваша планета отвечает на действия на поверхности. Часто это выражается как жара, которая приводит к землетрясениям и/или вулканическим извержениям. Но это может также вызвать другие типы частот. Есть другой аспект, который Вы должны рассмотреть: использование инфразвуковых машин секретных проектов по управлению эмоциональным состоянием людей. Такие инструменты могут вызвать еще более разрушительную реакцию планеты и, таким образом, солнечной системы.
Q: (L) Так Вы говорите, что это, возможно, было... Позвольте мне просто спросить: тогда это было результатом использования одной из этих инфразвуковых вещей, разработанных, чтобы разрушить эмоциональное состояние людей во Франции во время этой стрельбы Charlie Hebdo?
A: Да
Q: (L) Чтобы подготовить их...
(Pierre)... к событию с Charlie Hebdo?
A: Да
Q: (L) Вы также предлагаете или говорите, что использование инфразвуковых машин, для этого, и само по себе, может вызвать отрицательные реакции с планеты?
A: Да
Q: (L) И затем, если это вызывает негативные реакции людей, это усиливает негативную реакцию планеты?
A: Да
Q: (L) Это значит, что Франция настраивается на некоторое катастрофическое бедствие в результате этого действия и последующего поведения людей?
A: Да
Q: (Galatea) Это странно. Я проснулась очень радостной в тот день!
(L) Хорошо, когда-то давно Вы предсказали, что Франция испытает ядерное нападение...
A: Да
Q: (L) Мм, так с этим пока не закончено?
A: Да
Q: (Perceval) Может ли это быть естественным, в форме землетрясения, которое вызовет некоторую проблему на атомной электростанции?
A: Не так вероятно, как навлечение адских огней. Франция выбрала очень неблагоразумное направление.
Q: (Pierre) Так, удары метеоритов...
(L) Я не думаю, что они обязательно подразумевают метеориты. Это может быть метафорическое выражение. Вы подразумеваете определенно метеориты?
A:!? Может быть
...
Смотрите какие оговорки попускает Аллах
Канцлер Германии Ангела Меркель, выступая в бундестаге, допустила «неприятную оговорку», пишет Rheinische Post.
Говоря о недавних терактах в Париже, она заявила: «Антисемитизм – это наш государственный и гражданский долг».
К несчастью, продолжает издание, следующее предложение звучало так: «Это также касается и нападений на мечети».
Канцлер Германии Ангела Меркель, выступая в бундестаге, допустила «неприятную оговорку», пишет Rheinische Post.
Говоря о недавних терактах в Париже, она заявила: «Антисемитизм – это наш государственный и гражданский долг».
К несчастью, продолжает издание, следующее предложение звучало так: «Это также касается и нападений на мечети».
>терракт
Ну що ватаны? Гои таки начинают решать наши проблемы.
А вы говорили не получится.
http://www.sott.net/article/291494-The-dying-of-the-light
А вы говорили не получится.
http://www.sott.net/article/291494-The-dying-of-the-light
За день до этого Олланд предлагает снять санкции с России.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30679176
Бабах компания ручные обезьянки ЦРУ и Моссада. Инфа 100%.
Этот терракт знак омежке Олланду, занять своё место под шконарем
2 декабря
Франция признаёт Палестину.
http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2169839&cid=9
И ещё господа, Франция признала Палестину. А как мы знаем, ЦРУ Моссад не жарит одного зайца. Как и в случае с мш17 взорванным в день опиздюливания Палестины жидами психопатами - линия россия - палестина. Ну вы понели. Это жирный такой знак.