https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Basic_Principles_of_War_Propaganda
3. Our adversary's leader is inherently evil and resembles the devil
Morelli writes: "You can not hate a group of people altogether, not even as your enemies. It is therefore more effective to direct the hatred to the leading personality of the enemy country. This way, "the enemy" will have a face, and this face will naturally become the object of hatred."
She comments: "The victor will always portray himself as a pacifist who loves peaceful agreements and mutual understanding, but is forced into war by the opposing camp, as Bush or Blair did." "The enemy camp is most certainly run by a maniac, a monster (Milosevic, Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein), (...) which challenges us and from which one must free humanity."[4]
The first step in the process of demonization, according to Morelli, is the reduction of a whole country to a single person, as if nobody lived in Iraq, except Saddam Hussein with his "scary" Republican guards and his "frightful" weapons of mass destruction.
Personalizing conflicts is typical of a particular view of history, according to which history is made by heroes, by "great people". Anne Morelli rejects this view of history and writes tirelessly about what official historiography conceals. The official account of history is idealistic and metaphysical in that it assumes that history is the result of great ideas and great people. She opposes this view with a dialectical and materialistic one, in which history is explained from the basis of the relations between people and from social movements.
Morelli writes: "You can not hate a group of people altogether, not even as your enemies. It is therefore more effective to direct the hatred to the leading personality of the enemy country. This way, "the enemy" will have a face, and this face will naturally become the object of hatred."
She comments: "The victor will always portray himself as a pacifist who loves peaceful agreements and mutual understanding, but is forced into war by the opposing camp, as Bush or Blair did." "The enemy camp is most certainly run by a maniac, a monster (Milosevic, Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein), (...) which challenges us and from which one must free humanity."[4]
The first step in the process of demonization, according to Morelli, is the reduction of a whole country to a single person, as if nobody lived in Iraq, except Saddam Hussein with his "scary" Republican guards and his "frightful" weapons of mass destruction.
Personalizing conflicts is typical of a particular view of history, according to which history is made by heroes, by "great people". Anne Morelli rejects this view of history and writes tirelessly about what official historiography conceals. The official account of history is idealistic and metaphysical in that it assumes that history is the result of great ideas and great people. She opposes this view with a dialectical and materialistic one, in which history is explained from the basis of the relations between people and from social movements.
The opponent is characterized by all conceivable ills and evils. They range from the physical appearance to sexual life. Thus, Le Vif in L'Express on April 8, 1999 depicts the "terrible Milosevic", she quotes no statement or written document of the "ruler of Belgrade", but highlights his abnormal mood swings, his morbid and brutal outbursts of anger: "When getting in rage, his face is distorted. But all of a sudden, he will regain his composure." Of course, this demonization is used for other purposes as well, as all tools of propaganda are. Pierre Bourdieu, for example, reports that in the US university teachers who disliked Michel Foucault's popularity in their high schools wrote books on Foucault's private life. According to them, this "masochistic and crazy homosexual" practiced "unnatural, scandalous and unacceptable sexual practices." By disqualifying Foucault as a person, they could spare thenmselves the more difficult confrontation with the author's thinking or with the discourses of a political person and "refute" him on the basis of moral judgments.
5. The enemy is purposefully committing atrocities; if we are making mistakes this happens without intention Edit
Morelli maintains that the stories about the atrocities of the enemy are an essential element of propaganda. Cruelties are part of all wars. But insisting on the view that only the enemy has committed atrocities and that the "humanitarian" army was loved by the population makes stories of atrocities part of the propaganda. Moreover, Morelli goes on, war propaganda is not content with the actual incidents, it needs to invent inhuman atrocities in order to make the enemy look like Hitler's alter ego.
She sees hardly any differences in the way atrocities are described in different wars. For the period of the First World War, Ponsonby portrays the rendering of gang rape, murder, mistreatment and mutilation of children by German soldiers. Morelli shows how similar reports from wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Kosovo are.
Morelli maintains that the stories about the atrocities of the enemy are an essential element of propaganda. Cruelties are part of all wars. But insisting on the view that only the enemy has committed atrocities and that the "humanitarian" army was loved by the population makes stories of atrocities part of the propaganda. Moreover, Morelli goes on, war propaganda is not content with the actual incidents, it needs to invent inhuman atrocities in order to make the enemy look like Hitler's alter ego.
She sees hardly any differences in the way atrocities are described in different wars. For the period of the First World War, Ponsonby portrays the rendering of gang rape, murder, mistreatment and mutilation of children by German soldiers. Morelli shows how similar reports from wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Kosovo are.
7. We suffer few losses, the enemy's losses are considerable Edit
Morelli explains this principle or commandment as follows: "With rare exceptions, people tend to join the victorious cause. In the case of war, the preference of public opinion depends very much on the apparent results of the conflict. If the results are not good, the propaganda must disguise our losses and exaggerate those of the enemy."
She cites the fact that already in the First World War the losses accumulated within the first month and rose to 313,000 casualties. But the Supreme Command never even reported the loss of a horse and did not publish a list of the dead.
Morelli sees the Iraq war as another example of the prohibiting the publication of photographies of the coffins of American soldiers. The losses of the enemy, however, were gigantic, their army offered no resistance. "This type of information enhances morale in both camps and makes public opinion convinced of the effectiveness of the conflict."
Morelli explains this principle or commandment as follows: "With rare exceptions, people tend to join the victorious cause. In the case of war, the preference of public opinion depends very much on the apparent results of the conflict. If the results are not good, the propaganda must disguise our losses and exaggerate those of the enemy."
She cites the fact that already in the First World War the losses accumulated within the first month and rose to 313,000 casualties. But the Supreme Command never even reported the loss of a horse and did not publish a list of the dead.
Morelli sees the Iraq war as another example of the prohibiting the publication of photographies of the coffins of American soldiers. The losses of the enemy, however, were gigantic, their army offered no resistance. "This type of information enhances morale in both camps and makes public opinion convinced of the effectiveness of the conflict."
>1. We don't want war, we are only defending ourselves!
Обороняемся от москалей при помощи угрозы разместить НАТО рядом с границами москалей.
>2. Our adversary is solely responsible for this war!
Но москали сами виноваты.
>3. Our adversary's leader is inherently evil and resembles the devil
Пyтин сошёл с ума.
>4. We are defending a noble cause, not our particular interests!
А мы за европейскую цивилизацию.
>5. The enemy is purposefully committing atrocities; if we are making mistakes this happens without intention
Они бомбят наших рожениц из Азова.
>6. The enemy makes use of illegal weapons
Кластерными бомбами.
> 7. We suffer few losses, the enemy's losses are considerable
Потерь нет. Уничтожено 10 000 москалей, 700 танков, 300 самолётов.
>8. Recognized intellectuals and artists support our cause
Президент - артист.
>9. Our cause is sacred
Мы эльфы против мордора.
>10. Whoever casts doubt on our propaganda helps the enemy and is a traitor
Кто не с нами - тот ДРГ.
прямо один в один методичка ципсо.
просто тут есть один нюанс, чтобы уметь в пропаганду во время войны нужно обладать интеллектом человека, а не свинявой макаки. поэтому например военная пропаганда сша или россии выглядит заебок, а пропаганда свинявых выглядит потешно и максимально переможно. ципсошные высеры читаешь как будто бы их пейсал анимешник.
>>8. Recognized intellectuals and artists support our cause
Президент - артист.
Заорал
> поэтому например военная пропаганда сша или россии выглядит заебок
В голос
> ПОТЕРЬ НЕТ
> В ПЕРВЫЙ ДЕНЬ УНИЧТОЖИЛИ ВОЕННУЮ ИНФРАСТРУКТУРУ
> ВОТ-ВОТ ЗАВТРА ВОЗЬМЁМ КИЕВ
> НАЦИОНАЛИСТЫ
> НАРКОМАНЫ
> БИОЛАБОРАТОРИИ С ВИРУСАМИ УБИВАЮЩИМИ РУССКИХ
> ГРЯЗНАЯ ЯДЕРНАЯ БОМБА
> НОУТБУК НАТО С КАРТОЙ НАПАДЕНИЯ НА КРЫИ
> МЫ ГРАЖДАНСКИЕ ОБЪЕКТЫ НЕ БОМБИМ ЭТО ФЕЙК
> МЫ ГРАЖДАНСКИЕ ОБЪЕКТЫ НЕ БОМБИМ ЭТО ОНИ САМИ СЕБЯ
> МЫ ГРАЖДАНСКИЕ ОБЪЕКТЫ НЕ БОМБИМ НО ЕСЛИ БЫ БОМБИЛИ, ТО ЭТО ПОТОМУ ЧТО ТАМ БАНДЕРОВЦЫ СИДЯТ
Элегантность уровня /po/. Пиздец, ну и дебилы у вас в РИА ФАН сидят, хоть чуть-чуть тоньше нельзя было?
> БИОЛАБОРАТОРИИ С ВИРУСАМИ УБИВАЮЩИМИ РУССКИХ
Половина гринтекста хуита.
поэтому в руснявых видосах освобожденных городов одни и те же люди? нет, серьезно, понятно что военная пропаганда есть с обоих сторон, но почему рашке лень хотя бы разных актеров в разные города нанять?
>Кто не с нами - тот ДРГ.
В свое время пидарашки на домбассе этими дрг перемогали во всю а тут "ррррряяяя ниправильные дрг то всьо мирняк". ТОлько вот пидарашек никто даже слушать не хочет так как иван запизделся по полной.
Пидоран пытается перемогать тем, что у противника есть внезапно отдел пропаганды, как неожиданно (они есть везде во всех странах выше бантустана). А вот у пидарана такового нет что ли? Тогда пидаран - долбоеб, и сам расписывается в обосрамсе своего руководства, не заготовившего порцию пиздежа для противника.
Посмотрел и что, довен?
Ты знаешь, что значит слово "acknowledges"? Можешь посмотреть ещё раз и найти момент, где она признаёт существование лабораторий, связанных с разработкой биологического оружия?
С обеих сторон
Ну так она и призналась в международном преступлении.
Слово warfare, а не acknowledges можно убрать. Но инфа сотка что они там не изучение цветочков и бабочек спонсировали.
> инфа сотка
Откуда? В долбильне по секрету рассказали?
https://youtu.be/3Ct6fWnflYw
На, просвещайся, дебилушка, специально для таких, как ты, два часа разжёвывают.
Интересно, что мы не используем пункт 3, а хохлы не используют пункт 10.
>В долбильне по секрету рассказали?
Ты обосрался.
Не буду я это смотреть. Так что изучали там?
>Интересно, что мы не используем пункт 3
Как же "нацисты и наркоманы, захватившие власть"?
Ну вот нет демонизированного образа конкретного лидера. Зеленского скорее выставляют наркоманом и клоуном, чем демонизируют. А образ зла сосредоточен собирательно в нацбатах. Но впрочем да, это скорее показывает, что Анне Морелли надо обновить методичку монографию.
Да блядь ознакомились уже в нескольких вариантах, на живых примерах.
Бамп
>нацбатах
Забавно что сам этот термин - изобретение русской пропаганды, симулякр как есть.
Свеженькое.
