К сожалению, значительная часть сохранённых до 2024 г. изображений и видео была потеряна (подробности случившегося). Мы призываем всех неравнодушных помочь нам с восстановлением утраченного контента!
Сортировка: за
Сохранен
2
6 июля 13:31
Сохранен
2
6 июля 13:30
Сохранен
2
6 июля 13:24
Сохранен
2
6 июля 13:12
Сохранен
2
6 июля 12:32
Сохранен
2
5 июля 20:35
Сохранен
2
5 июля 17:16
Сохранен
2
5 июля 17:01
Сохранен
2
5 июля 16:52
Сохранен
2
5 июля 13:57
Сохранен
2
5 июля 13:27
Сохранен
2
5 июля 13:16
Сохранен
2
>>334606687 Прежде чем писать на подментач, вымой песок из вагины, пожалуйста, прошу. >Ho — >>334606687 Прежде чем писать на подментач, вымой песок из вагины, пожалуйста, прошу. >How much are US and Canada's businesses (moderate to large) reliant on BlackRock and other global superinvestor's financial support? Either directly (financing) or indirectly (financing critical peers, child/parent companies). The narrative that firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (often called the "Big Three") "own and control" corporate America and Canada is a common focal point in financial media and online discourse. The reality of how dependent moderate-to-large businesses are on these global asset managers requires breaking down the difference between ownership, financing, and operational control. 1. Direct Financing (Do they fund the business?) Very rarely. A common misconception is that if BlackRock "owns" 8% of a company, it gave that company billions of dollars. The Equity Market: When an ETF like BlackRock’s iShares buys stock in Apple or Royal Bank of Canada, they are almost always buying it from other investors on the secondary stock exchange (the NYSE or TSX). The actual business doesn't receive a dime of that money. Passive Management: BlackRock and Vanguard are primarily passive index managers. If a company is added to the S&P 500 or the TSX Composite, BlackRock must buy its shares to match the index. The business isn't relying on BlackRock’s "support"; BlackRock is legally bound by its own fund prospectuses to buy the stock. The Private Credit Exception: This is changing slightly. BlackRock and rivals like Brookfield and Blackstone have aggressively expanded into private credit (direct lending to medium and large private businesses). If a moderate-sized company needs a $500 million loan and banks are tightening their belts, they may borrow directly from BlackRock’s private credit arm. In this specific sector, businesses are directly reliant on them for financing. 2. Indirect Reliance (The Web of Peers and Parents) While they don’t directly fund standard operations, businesses are deeply tied to the Big Three through indirect market dynamics: The Shareholder Base The Big Three collectively manage over $30 trillion in assets. They are the largest shareholders in roughly 88% of S&P 500 companies and hold massive stakes in Canada's TSX 60. Corporate Stability: Because index funds rarely sell unless a company drops out of an index, BlackRock provides a "permanent floor" of equity capital. If BlackRock suddenly stopped buying a company's stock, that company's valuation would crater, making it much harder for the business to raise money in the future via new stock offerings. Banking and Debt Liquidity You mentioned reliance via "critical peers." Look no further than the banking sector. BlackRock and Vanguard are consistently the top institutional investors in major US and Canadian banks (e.g., JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, RBC). Since moderate-to-large businesses rely on these commercial banks for revolving credit lines, lines of equipment financing, and everyday cash management, they are indirectly dependent on the superinvestors who provide the underlying capital and stability to the banking system itself. 3. Governance and Structural Power (The Real "Reliance") Moderate-to-large businesses do not rely on BlackRock for permission to run their daily operations, but they are highly reactive to their voting power. Because the Big Three hold massive chunks of public companies, they control roughly 25% of the aggregate votes at shareholder meetings. A business relies on BlackRock's goodwill for: Board Elections: If BlackRock decides a company's board is underperforming, they can vote them out. Executive Compensation: CEO raises and stock options are heavily influenced by institutional guidelines. Strategic Direction: If an activist investor tries to force a large company to split up or sell a division, the outcome almost entirely depends on whether BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street side with corporate management or the activist. Summary: A Mutual Dependency Moderate-to-large North American businesses are not "dependent" on BlackRock in the sense that BlackRock cuts them a check to keep the lights on. BlackRock is merely the custodian holding shares on behalf of hundreds of millions of everyday pension holders and retail investors. However, businesses are entirely reliant on the market liquidity, stable equity valuation, and proxy voting approval that BlackRock and its peers command. If tomorrow a company falls completely out of favor with the global asset management giants, its stock will plummet, its borrowing costs will spike, and its executive leadership will likely be replaced.
5 июля 9:48
Сохранен
2
5 июля 11:37
Сохранен
2
5 июля 10:43
Сохранен
2
5 июля 8:49
Сохранен
2
5 июля 1:58
Сохранен
2
4 июля 16:32
Сохранен
2
4 июля 16:52
Сохранен
2
4 июля 15:46
Сохранен
2
4 июля 13:03
Сохранен
2
4 июля 12:05
Сохранен
2
4 июля 7:52
Сохранен
2
3 июля 19:38
Сохранен
2
3 июля 16:13